SFP+ is the upgraded version of the SFP, 10G SFP+ transceiver are
multi-purpose optical modules for 10Gbit/s data transmission
applications at 850nm, 1310nm and 1550nm. The transceivers are ideally
suited to datacom and storage area network (SAN/NAS) applications
depending on the IEEE 802.3ae and Fibre Channel standards, Fiber Channel
10G, 8.5G, 4.25G, 2.125G, 1.0625G, 10GB SFP+ SR/SW/LR/ER, 1000 Base-SX Ethernet. The 10G SFP+ transceivers are fully compliant to the SFP+ MSA and so are hot-swap.
While Cisco SFP+
reduces overall system cost, it puts new burdens around the PHY's
design and satisfaction. The SFI involving the host board and the SFP+
module presents significant design and test challenges.
One obvious challenge is the increased port density and the
testing time required with 48 or even more ports per rack. For example,
you can find 15 measurements each for that host transmitter tests, each
of the measurements using manual methods can simply take from three to
five minutes. What this means is an exam engineer is going to take a lot
more than one hour per port to complete the necessary tests, multiplied
across the number of ports.
Another challenge is moving seamlessly from your compliance
environment to a debug environment. In case a measurement fails, just
how can the designer pick which component is causing the failure and
debug the issue to reach the root cause? Such determinations are
specially challenging given the tight physical packaging little designs.
Yet another problem that a lot of designers face today relates to
connectivity: ways to get the signal out of the device under test (DUT)
to a oscilloscope. Test fixtures are typically required but questions
arise around whether or not the fixtures are already tested and
validated from the specification.
The SFF-8431 SFP+ specification was written with the perspective
that a lot of design and test engineers use equivalent-time
oscilloscopes. The truth is, most designers choose to use real-time
oscilloscopes since it assists them to get involved with debug mode more
easily. Also with oscilloscopes supporting bandwidths in excess of 30
GHz with fast sampling rates, rise some time and bandwidth far less of
your constraint laptop or computer was only a short while ago. However,
the task is to interpret the specification poor a real-time oscilloscope
when compared with an equivalent-time model.
Another challenge to organize for is that the SFP+ specification
calls out some measurements being performed using a PRBS31 signal. Some
measurements (total jitter and eye-mask hit ratio) have PRBS31 as a
recommended pattern. The most record length possible for acquisition
with popular high-performance real-time oscilloscopes is 200 million
samples. With a sampling rate of fifty Gsamples/s, the designer can get
around 40 million unit intervals (UIs). At a sampling rate of 100
Gsamples/s, the instrument can buy 20 million UIs. However, a PRBS31
pattern has a lot more than 2 billion UIs. Hence, acquiring an entire
pattern presents challenging.
Additionally, acquiring a record length of 200 million data
points demands huge processing power and time. One solution is to treat
the PRBS31 waveform being an arbitrary waveform and get a modest record
length of Two million to Tens of millions of UIs to recover the time and
compute the results. This gives a great tradeoff between processing
power and test-result accuracy.
Since it supplies a great amount of detail about the health of
the SFP+ design, test engineers must master the TWDPc measurement. TWDPC
requires a special algorithm, that your SFP+ specification defines.
This test is described as a measure with the deterministic
dispersion penalty as a result of particular transmitter close to the
emulated multi-mode fibers + a well-characterized receiver. The
fiber-optics concept continues to be extended to quantify the channel
performance of high-speed copper links, also referred to as
"10GSFP+Cu."Do you want to know more information about SFP+ transceivers
or want to buy some fiber optic products.I think Fiberstore can help you.
没有评论:
发表评论